<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Evaluating Openness&#8217; Missive Highlighted in New Social Patterns Opus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laaker.com/micah/press-releases/2009/evaluating-openness-missive-highlighted-in-new-social-patterns-opus/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laaker.com/micah/press-releases/2009/evaluating-openness-missive-highlighted-in-new-social-patterns-opus</link>
	<description>Made in the U.S.A. by the Double A.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:33:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.laaker.com/micah/press-releases/2009/evaluating-openness-missive-highlighted-in-new-social-patterns-opus/comment-page-1#comment-62206</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=409#comment-62206</guid>
		<description>Jack, great observation. What you (and Tom, and others, I&#039;m sure, too) are describing would, in my words, be summed up as a 14th point (or a sub-point of Open Doors, as it appears to be a one-dimensional take on that point):

Open Windows
Users act as observers, but not participants, in this two-way mirror development process. By gazing in, users gain insight into (and possibly a connection to) an end-result or product as it is developed. Their feedback, however, is not integral to such a process, nor is it necessarily encouraged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, great observation. What you (and Tom, and others, I&#8217;m sure, too) are describing would, in my words, be summed up as a 14th point (or a sub-point of Open Doors, as it appears to be a one-dimensional take on that point):</p>
<p>Open Windows<br />
Users act as observers, but not participants, in this two-way mirror development process. By gazing in, users gain insight into (and possibly a connection to) an end-result or product as it is developed. Their feedback, however, is not integral to such a process, nor is it necessarily encouraged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Repenning</title>
		<link>http://www.laaker.com/micah/press-releases/2009/evaluating-openness-missive-highlighted-in-new-social-patterns-opus/comment-page-1#comment-62150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Repenning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=409#comment-62150</guid>
		<description>Where would you place &quot;transparency&quot; models, like &quot;open government,&quot; in this spectrum? These are kind of like &quot;Open Door,&quot; in that the process is &quot;open&quot; to users, but they may not provide the input: users are invited in as audience, but any contributions they make go through some other route. Tom Grant, Forrester, identified this model recently (http://bit.ly/elWXyY).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where would you place &#8220;transparency&#8221; models, like &#8220;open government,&#8221; in this spectrum? These are kind of like &#8220;Open Door,&#8221; in that the process is &#8220;open&#8221; to users, but they may not provide the input: users are invited in as audience, but any contributions they make go through some other route. Tom Grant, Forrester, identified this model recently (<a href="http://bit.ly/elWXyY" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/elWXyY</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.laaker.com @ 2012-02-08 07:28:50 -->
