http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2009/open13 Made in the U.S.A. by the Double A. Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:33:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2009/open13/comment-page-1#comment-27566 Chris Messina reflecting on an open social web « Fredzimny’s CCCCC Blog Sun, 24 May 2009 17:16:08 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=365#comment-27566 [...] Moreover, the term “open” itself is being debased, being used in pop-marketing campaigns to connote crowd-sourced and “conversationy” marketing — things that have nothing to do with the freedom desired by open source proponents. Thomas Jefferson (or John Philpot Curran) got it right when he said that the “price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” We can’t fight for open if we don’t have a testable definition of what “open” means. [...] [...] Moreover, the term “open” itself is being debased, being used in pop-marketing campaigns to connote crowd-sourced and “conversationy” marketing — things that have nothing to do with the freedom desired by open source proponents. Thomas Jefferson (or John Philpot Curran) got it right when he said that the “price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” We can’t fight for open if we don’t have a testable definition of what “open” means. [...]

]]> http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2009/open13/comment-page-1#comment-27233 The open, social web | FactoryCity Mon, 18 May 2009 13:28:40 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=365#comment-27233 [...] Moreover, the term “open” itself is being debased, being used in pop-marketing campaigns to connote crowd-sourced and “conversationy” marketing — things that have nothing to do with the freedom desired by open source proponents. Thomas Jefferson (or John Philpot Curran) got it right when he said that the “price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” We can’t fight for open if we don’t have a testable definition of what “open” means. [...] [...] Moreover, the term “open” itself is being debased, being used in pop-marketing campaigns to connote crowd-sourced and “conversationy” marketing — things that have nothing to do with the freedom desired by open source proponents. Thomas Jefferson (or John Philpot Curran) got it right when he said that the “price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” We can’t fight for open if we don’t have a testable definition of what “open” means. [...]

]]> http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2009/open13/comment-page-1#comment-26675 links for 2009-05-07 - paulcarvill.com Thu, 07 May 2009 23:07:13 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=365#comment-26675 [...] » Defining What it Means to be Open « Laaker.com - Micah Laaker Designing your product asa platform. I particularly like point 11: "The user is welcomed/embraced as a product decision-maker in this corporate bizarro world." (tags: platform software architecture development) [...] [...] » Defining What it Means to be Open « Laaker.com – Micah Laaker Designing your product asa platform. I particularly like point 11: "The user is welcomed/embraced as a product decision-maker in this corporate bizarro world." (tags: platform software architecture development) [...]

]]>