Comments on: In Defense of the Animal Cracker http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker Made in the U.S.A. by the Double A. Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:33:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: sara http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker/comment-page-1#comment-65844 sara Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:57:38 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=163#comment-65844 I love trader joes animal crackers! perfectly dry and slightly sweet. also only 2g of fat for like 22 crackers! and you are right nabisco makes cookies. I love trader joes animal crackers! perfectly dry and slightly sweet. also only 2g of fat for like 22 crackers! and you are right nabisco makes cookies.

]]> By: Micah http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker/comment-page-1#comment-44036 Micah Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:17:00 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=163#comment-44036 Isaiah, Hey, man. I appreciate you taking time out from saving all the other problems in the world to come over, take the time to read such a long article, and then add such meaningful commentary. Sounds like your priorities are in good order, too. Thanks! In the meantime, i hope you've had a chance to try out some Trader Joe's animal crackers. They. Are. Delicious. Isaiah,
Hey, man. I appreciate you taking time out from saving all the other problems in the world to come over, take the time to read such a long article, and then add such meaningful commentary. Sounds like your priorities are in good order, too. Thanks! In the meantime, i hope you’ve had a chance to try out some Trader Joe’s animal crackers. They. Are. Delicious.

]]> By: isaiah http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker/comment-page-1#comment-43690 isaiah Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:19:50 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=163#comment-43690 who cares!!!!! just eat the dang things they taste, smell, look, and feel the exact same way wether theyre called animal crackers or cookies_all the problems in this world and yall are worrried about this!!!!!!!!!!! who cares!!!!! just eat the dang things they taste, smell, look, and feel the exact same way wether theyre called animal crackers or cookies_all the problems in this world and yall are worrried about this!!!!!!!!!!!

]]> By: William http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker/comment-page-1#comment-20594 William Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:55:15 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=163#comment-20594 I was just ruminating on the phrase so often used by my departed grandmother, 'posing for animal crackers' and wound up here. Still don't know its originator or first use, but I got to read your funny post. I was just ruminating on the phrase so often used by my departed grandmother, 'posing for animal crackers' and wound up here. Still don't know its originator or first use, but I got to read your funny post.

]]> By: marshalsandler.com » » In Defense of the Animal Cracker « Laaker.com - Micah Laaker http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker/comment-page-1#comment-17976 marshalsandler.com » » In Defense of the Animal Cracker « Laaker.com - Micah Laaker Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:24:09 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=163#comment-17976 [...] » In Defense of the Animal Cracker « Laaker.com - Micah Laaker. Written by marshal in: Uncategorized | [...] [...] » In Defense of the Animal Cracker « Laaker.com – Micah Laaker. Written by marshal in: Uncategorized | [...]

]]> By: That Kid from Omaha http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker/comment-page-1#comment-17762 That Kid from Omaha Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:42:58 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=163#comment-17762 Really great point there, Ricky, and very cogent. Also grt spllng; I can tell you're in a rush to get on to sharing your folksy wisdom on other blogs. Good day to you, as well. Really great point there, Ricky, and very cogent. Also grt spllng; I can tell you're in a rush to get on to sharing your folksy wisdom on other blogs. Good day to you, as well.

]]> By: ricky http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker/comment-page-1#comment-17741 ricky Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:38:13 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=163#comment-17741 wow seriously...calling them animal crackers<br>and not animal cookies doesnt rly matter.<br>the name of the "cookie" is animal "cracker"<br>so its not rly that big a deal<br>and if u think so, get a life.<br>good day. wow seriously…calling them animal crackers
and not animal cookies doesnt rly matter.
the name of the “cookie” is animal “cracker”
so its not rly that big a deal
and if u think so, get a life.
good day.

]]> By: That Kid from Omaha http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker/comment-page-1#comment-16847 That Kid from Omaha Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:02:05 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=163#comment-16847 Good catch. I've updated accordingly. <br><br>Re: level of seriousness, you are correct... I take Big Biscuit's actions very seriously. Who knows what's next? Triscuits might soon be labeled a "hearty wheat cake," and next thing you know, BAM!, cakes as we know them disappear from the planet. Good catch. I’ve updated accordingly.

Re: level of seriousness, you are correct… I take Big Biscuit’s actions very seriously. Who knows what’s next? Triscuits might soon be labeled a “hearty wheat cake,” and next thing you know, BAM!, cakes as we know them disappear from the planet.

]]> By: nicole http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker/comment-page-1#comment-16848 nicole Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:30:26 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=163#comment-16848 Good, I got you "crackers" and not "cookies". *shwew* Good, I got you “crackers” and not “cookies”. *shwew*

]]> By: seldo http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker/comment-page-1#comment-16846 seldo Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:20:21 +0000 http://www.laaker.com/micah/?p=163#comment-16846 You... may be taking this matter a little seriously. Also, your link to Stauffer's crackers goes to Keebler instead. You… may be taking this matter a little seriously. Also, your link to Stauffer’s crackers goes to Keebler instead.

]]>