Comments on: In Defense of the Animal Cracker

By: William

William — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:55:15 +0000

I was just ruminating on the phrase so often used by my departed grandmother, 'posing for animal crackers' and wound up here. Still don't know its originator or first use, but I got to read your funny post.

By: marshalsandler.com » » In Defense of the Animal Cracker « Laaker.com - Micah Laaker

Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:24:09 +0000

[...] » In Defense of the Animal Cracker « Laaker.com – Micah Laaker. Written by marshal in: Uncategorized | [...]

By: That Kid from Omaha

That Kid from Omaha — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:42:58 +0000

Really great point there, Ricky, and very cogent. Also grt spllng; I can tell you're in a rush to get on to sharing your folksy wisdom on other blogs. Good day to you, as well.

By: ricky

ricky — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:38:13 +0000

wow seriously…calling them animal crackers
and not animal cookies doesnt rly matter.
the name of the “cookie” is animal “cracker”
so its not rly that big a deal
and if u think so, get a life.
good day.

By: That Kid from Omaha

That Kid from Omaha — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:02:05 +0000

Good catch. I’ve updated accordingly.

Re: level of seriousness, you are correct… I take Big Biscuit’s actions very seriously. Who knows what’s next? Triscuits might soon be labeled a “hearty wheat cake,” and next thing you know, BAM!, cakes as we know them disappear from the planet.

By: nicole

nicole — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:30:26 +0000

Good, I got you “crackers” and not “cookies”. *shwew*

By: seldo

seldo — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:20:21 +0000

You… may be taking this matter a little seriously. Also, your link to Stauffer’s crackers goes to Keebler instead.